The Supreme Court & Judicial Branches of the Government

unmatched seminal pictureation on the differences between familiar and private baron was offered by Grant McConnell (1966). This interpretation posits the supposition that there is a miss of clear demarcation between overt and private power. This is in general due to the fact that the governmental system in the coupled States is dominated by literally hundreds of small decision devising arenas and that there is an accepted orthodoxy in American political theory that favors both small constituency policymaking and private interests (Kahn, 1982).

As a political given, this system forms somewhat of a game in the federal, state, and topical anesthetic policy arenas. In fact, more often than not, "the distributional consequences of 'public policies' are the intended result of the private interests which have been instrumental in their design, passage, and implementation" (Navarro, 1984, ix). Thus, any semblance of true democratic look is absent since the term "public policy" should mean the introduction of issues for the general welfare of the entire group but commonly focuses on the needs of the few, the powerful, or those with the type of influence mandatory to gain access to the Court.

Some have said that "to render the Supreme Court is a task that forces lawyers to become philosophers, for the Constitution, as Woodrow Wilson said, is not a mere la

Levy, L.W. (1974). Against the Law: The Nixon Court and

wyers' document" (Miller, 1978, 3). The Supreme Court, whose task it is to interpret the Constitution as a living document, must thus look at society as a square when making decisions that will affect not only the underway generation, but generations to come.

Judicial Process. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

As an institution, then, the literature on the Court seems to have been grounded in political jurisprudence (Shapiro, 1964).

or so authors have examined the role of the Court as an exercise of power under stress, going so far as to address the subject into literary journalism (Woodward and Armstrong, 1979). Yet, in the current decade, wholeness author has looked at the political revolts surrounding the court and posited the notion that the conventional wisdom that the whim of the Court is more substantial than the law is often lacking in substance (O'Brien, 1986). One then sees that the Court is not completely shielded from public insisting, or in fact, from the special interest or pressure groups that have become even more powerful in the last few decades.

Brighman, J. (1987). The Cult of the Court. Philadelphia:

In the mid 1950s, Peltason commented that "A judicial decision is but one phase in the neverending group conflict, a single look of the political process" (1955). Pelatson's generalization seems appropriate today, when environmental groups, cultured rights and other minority organizations, as well as the non-finite of other special interest groups band together and while to the courts as one of their primary means of gaining access to public power.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.