Characteristics Associated with Successful Adjustment to Supervision

The background section of the expression explained the stress and objectives of "boot summer camp" prison programs. That the major focus of "boot camp" prison programs is rehabilitation is evidentiary to the discover findings reported in the article. The background section of the article overly reviewed the findings and conclusions of other studies reported in the literature of "boot camp" prison programs. These findings are practice sessionful to the readers of this article, because they provide reference points for use in the assessment of the findings and conclusions reported by the authors in this article.

The consumption section of this article explains that the authors report the findings and conclusions of two separate, but related, studies in this article. The authors explain that they set out to examine the adjustment of offenders during the association supervision phase of the bruise program, which is the term used by the authors to characterize a "boot camp" prison program, in the first study, while, in the second study they assessed the characteristics of the prisoners who completed some(prenominal) the shock incarceration and the community supervision phases of a shock program. This information is useful to the reader, because the authors discuss implications drawn from a proportion of the results of the two studies.

The section devoted to contain 1 in the article discusses the study in the context of method, and results and discussion. These two subsections are critiqued separately.

Data were collected on all prisoners who entered the shock incarceration program from the fall of 1987 by the fall of 1988. Thus, although the program was not random, there are no questions in this context concerning the reliability if the data collected.

The procedure utilise to assemble the research model was not randomized in character. Rather, the researchers collected data on all eligible prisoners first-class honours degree in the spring of 1988 until data had either been collected on 100 prisoners in a designated sample group or until oneyear had elapsed, which ever occurred first. Certainly, this procedure was efficient; however, it does erect some methodological questions concerning reliability.

The researchers also noted that, while IQ was a factor that explained some of the variations of adjustment in orbit 2, that it was not a factor in Study 1. In actual fact, however, IQ was not considered as an intervening changeable in Study 1, although an education variable was considered. Education, however, is not ineluctably compatible with IQ.

Intervening variables considered in the analyses of the data in Study 1 included succession, years of formal education, race, sentence length, and age at first arrest. These intervening variables were useful in evaluating the performance of prisoners from the four sample groups. One intervening variable that would switch likely been useful that was not considered in Study 1 was offense type.

The researchers appear to have missed the point of their findings. turn they acknowledge that controlling for the train of supervision eliminates any significant differences between shock incarceration parolees and the other three sample groups, they continue to emphasize that such differences do exist when the level of supervision is not considered. That approach is about the same as contending that humans should base their behavior on the fact that they would louse up in the air if graveness were not present. As gravity is present, ho
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.