12 Angry Men

For our oral presentation on 12 Angry men Jenny Gray, Kathryn Burt and I decided to perform the oral creatively. We took on the role of the sons defence lawyers and argued our case in front of the level who pretended to be the panel. Our oral revolved around sestet patchs of evidence, which were the: 1. boys motive 2. boys alibi 3. woman across the tracks seeing the boy kill his father 4. old man down steps hearing the boy yell Im going to kill you! 5. uncommon knife 6. old man seeing the boy fulfil down the stairs Our aim was to attempt that each piece of the above evidence was not correct and there was a strong reasonable doubt that the boy did kill his father. I believe that our group performed our oral very well. We were confident in what we were doing and we were well prepared. We made sure that we would have as often class interaction as possible by ask questions, having a vote, and asking volunteers from the class to take part in some of the evidence we presented.



For example we asked Bradley to tie his shoes laces unneurotic and see how far he could walk in cardinal seconds to prove that the old man could not have walked to the access in that time.

There was a small problem with proving the poop point of evidence since the volume of the CD player could not be turned up high enough to prove our point properly. However, I still believe convinced the jury (our class) that the boy was innocent and since this was our aim I believe we successfully presented our oral.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.